Job Search Wheat and Chaff, How to Separate

I recently had a brief email conversation about an article I just wrote in three parts. It covered how a hiring manager sees candidates. I received a comment that was reasonable. The bottom line is there is so much information out there, how do you know what is helpful and what is not. It also is really saying what is worth paying for and what is not worth paying for. Very good questions that I am sure most people ask themselves. I agree.

I just did a search on the internet for, job search advice. It had over 90 million results. No wonder it is a difficult decision. I think there are a number of things that what you say bring to mind.

How do you separate the wheat from the chaff of quality versus worthless information, advice and tips?

Now, while it is difficult to separate the wheat from the chaff, it is not impossible. One has to separate the assumptions that most start with that result in the false conclusions they come up with. Let me see if I can illustrate what I mean.

I pointed out in this and several other articles, the method the vast majority use to find a job is antiquated at best. I also wrote an article about the origins and evolution of the job search methodology. In the late 1940s and 1950s into the 1960s companies were struggling to find people. That is when employment agencies came into existence. They ran ads (either real or fictitious) to attract a job seeker to their office. When the individual went there they were interviewed. It wasn’t what you and I would expect as an interview. It was rudimentary and just to collect basic information. The recruiter filled out paper work and then the candidate waited in a holding pen. The recruiter immediately called numerous companies that might need a person like the one they had just interviewed.

When they came upon one, they sent the person to an interview with the company. They reported back to the recruiter with the results. In this case the candidate paid the employment agency not as it is today, where the company pays the recruiter. It evolved slightly when people became more mobile for their jobs. They might answer ads in the newspaper in a locale. They sent a cover letter and resume (work history) to the company. They got a call to interview over the phone, then a face to face.

It has not gone much further than that today as you know. Yes, we have added the technology of computers, Blackberries and the speed and distance it can cover. It also adds to the job seekers ability to research companies. Other than that not much has changed. You can see that it really was a strong demand for people and many people seeking jobs so it was a matching process and not much more. Today, it is a weak demand for people, a large supply and very little process wise to match the two.

You may have read my description of how jobs have become very complex today. Think back over your career and how your work has changed in complexity for many different reasons. That is not taking into consideration the complexity of the challenges and the culture of companies today.

The question becomes why are people still trying to simply match what is on paper with what a company says it needs in an ad (job posting)? I think you can see how difficult that is for the employer. It is obviously equally difficult for the job seeker to know what the employer wants and present it on the old standard resume.

All of that long winded explanation leads back to the separation question. The assumption job seekers should make is, what advice, information, training, coaching, etc, is offered that is not the 1950s, 1960s style process.

My partner and I have been following our process for many years. My partner recognized long ago what I just explained. He learned how to find out from an employer, specifically what a hiring manager, wanted as the ideal candidate for that specific position they needed right then. From there he developed and we have refined over time, how to follow that process to finding the exact person that would fit and qualify them to know they were qualified. Then, we presented them to the client. But, not just present them, but present them in a manner that showed the hiring manager they were exactly what he/she was looking for in the position. We then prepared the candidate to present themselves properly, asking questions only we knew to ask because we asked the right questions up front. The candidate’s education, skills, experience and accomplishments matched with the questions as the answers. We prepared the candidate how to get an offer and how to properly negotiate it so it was as win-win for both employer and candidate. It takes a great deal of work. It works every time.

That is not anywhere close to the traditional method. I could go on for what would seem like hundreds of pages with the details.

I don’t know how much research you have done to find good information on a job search, but neither my partner, our researchers, nor I have been able to find a process near to what we have put together. All others we have encountered have some variation that leads to the traditional process.

My advice is simply to question every piece of advice and ask why would that advance what I am trying to accomplish? If it won’t do anything different then it probably isn’t a help. Just changing how a resume looks isn’t going to get anyone’s attention. Knowing how to answer the question, what are your strengths ten different ways, isn’t going to wow a hiring manager. If you present yourself with information of how you can solve their specific problems, then you will get their attention.

That is just a sample of the issues. There are many more to overcome. Everyone’s mind set is so ingrained on the rules. The fact is there really aren’t rules yet everyone is fixated on them instead of thinking through what does the hiring manger want? And, it is beyond that, because every hiring manager wants something different even for the same titled position. We teach how to know all of that and how to respond to all of it. We go further to teach how to get the offer and how to get the one you want.

I hope that brings some clarity and not muddy the waters further.

This is why we take 5 hours to explain it in our webinars and another hour just for resumes.